Online Casino

A Stance of Major Online Casino Operators on VPN use

747. live

1. What Our Team Find Out

The Mines Games team checked a handful of established online casino operators to examine what their stance is on customers who access their products and services via virtual private networks. We carefully perused their terms and conditions, and as it turned out, they all prohibit players from using VPNs to mask their real location.

2. Bovada Considers VPN Usage a ‘Fraudulent Activity’

US-facing gambling operator Bovada strictly prohibits access through virtual private networks. The site’s terms and conditions clearly state that the operator considers it a fraudulent activity to use “a VPN, proxy, or similar service that masks or manipulates the identification of [customers’] real location”. Players who violate the rules will have their balances forfeited.

3. 888casino Collects Information about External Software

Major gambling brand 888casino has also adopted a hardline stance on virtual private networks. Under the terms of its privacy policy, the casino reserves the right to collect information about external software installed on customers’ devices that can potentially enable them to engage in fraudulent activities. This allows the operator to detect whether “the connection you are using is via a VPN or proxy”.

4. 7BitCasino Also Frowns at VPN Use

Crypto-friendly site 7BitCasino caters to customers with various decentralized currencies like Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum. However, the platform’s stance on virtual private networks is rather uncompromising. The casino’s terms and conditions expressly state that “using VPN to bypass a [software] provider’s block is strictly prohibited”. Players found guilty of this violation may have their winnings confiscated.

5. Repercussions for Online Casino Players

As you can clearly see, gambling sites do not take VPN usage lightly. While players caught red-handed are not legally prosecuted, they will still suffer some repercussions for violating the casinos’ rules. The operators usually resort to one of two measures:

  • Account closure and confiscation of your real-money balance
  • Account closure, confiscation of winnings, and deposit refunds

6. The Case of Poker Pro Gordon Vayo

The second measure is more commonly enforced. One notable case that comes to mind concerns professional poker player Gordon Vayo who won US$692,000 during the PokerStars Spring Championship of Online Poker (SCOOP) in 2017.

The online poker platform denied him payment after establishing Vayo had used a virtual private network to feign he was playing the tourney from Canada while being physically located in California. Online poker is illegal in the Golden State. Vayo subsequently had his account frozen after he attempted to cash out his six-figure profits.

The player filed a lawsuit against the poker platform but dropped it after Poker Stars obtained proof that he hired a document forger to falsify his bank statements and conceal the fact he was in the United States during the tournament.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *